By now you know why peer review matters, and why it’s important to be a better critic and accept constructive criticism. But to learn is to do, so let’s test your improved critiquing skills before really putting them to use.

Answer the following questions for TWO policies (proposals, a bill on the order paper or successful legislation) that address the same theme, but seek different outcomes (ex: two environmental laws, one focused on helping the economy and one focused on helping nature). Use the government of Canada’s web site to search for proposed and successful bills/policies, or search online for additional resources.

Describe

  • What was your first thought when you reviewed the policy? Why?
  • Who is or what will be impacted by the policy?
  • What do you believe is the policy’s ultimate goal?

Analyze

  • What is the name of the policy? Is the preamble and the summary clear? Do they help you understand the intent of the policy better? Is the information accurate and reflective of the policy’s content?
  • In your opinion, who is the main benefactor (issue, stakeholder or both) of the policy?
  • Are there sub-benefactors? Will the policy address other priorities, issues or stakeholders while helping the main benefactor?
  • Do the provisions and clauses (supporting details) help add to the understanding of the policy?
  • Are the explanatory notes/is the sourcing reliable, accurate and complete?
  • Is the bill missing any elements? Are there laws, treaties or other legal consequences that need to be addressed?

Interpret

  • Why do you think the policy is being/was proposed?
  • What is the purpose of the policy? To offer a solution? To ban something? To incent an action?
  • What message does the policy send to the public?
  • Is there enough detail in the policy to create an effective, impactful result? Or will additional policies be required to fully solve the problem being addressed?
  • Is there anything confusing that needs clarification?

Evaluate

  • Do you agree with the policy?
  • What do you like the most about it? What do you dislike?
  • Were stakeholders properly consulted?
  • How has the policy been received? Or how will the policy be received? Is there bipartisan support? Is there or will there be any pockets of opposition in the community?
  • Can you think of any improvements that would make this policy more effective?
  • Why do you think the policy was or will be successful/unsuccessful?
  • What might you have done if given the opportunity to craft your own version of this policy?

Now compare and contrast your reviews and determine which policy is more successful, from your perspective. Point out what specific points led you to this decision and remember to keep these ideas in mind as you work on your final project.