How Floor Crossings Might Impact Canadian Politics

As we’ve discussed previously in Nature Labs, floor crossing involves Members of Parliament switching party allegiance mid-term, shaking up government stability. And in recent months, we’ve seen a lot of floor crossing! With Nunavut NDP MP Lori Idlout’s recent crossing to the Liberals, the Mark Carney-led minority government is creeping closer to that all-important 172-seat threshold required to form a majority government in our House of Commons. But is floor crossing legal? Is it fair? And why exactly does having a majority of seats in the House of Commons matter? We’re here to help!


What exactly is floor crossing?


The term originates from the British Westminster system of government, where MPs physically cross the floor of the House of Commons to join the opposing side. In Canada, this practice dates to pre- Confederation (like a 1866 New Brunswick anti-Confederate switching for a cabinet post), carrying over UK traditions to our parliamentary system.


Yes! Floor crossing is fully legal and not prohibited by our constitution. It aligns with Westminster conventions and has been upheld by our courts in cases like Fletcher v. Manitoba, where anti-crossing laws were struck down for violating parliamentary tradition.


Is it fair?


Here’s where things get a bit sticky. It’s controversial, at the very least. Many feel MPs should face the electorate if they want to switch sides in the House, especially when floor crossing happens shortly after an election. After all, while we technically vote for individuals to represent us in the House of Commons, most people vote for the party brand a candidate represents. On the flip side, while Conservatives and the NDP are outraged members of their caucuses have left for the governing Liberals, it’s worth also remembering that almost every party in the House has benefited from floor crossers at some point in their history.

  • In addition to the NDP’s Lori Idlout, the Liberals have also added former Conservative
    MPs Matt Jeneroux, Michael Ma, and Chris d’Entremont to their ranks. The Liberals have
    poached opposition MPs in the past as well, like when Tory Belinda Stronach (2005)
    crossed to the Liberals to help former Prime Minister Paul Martin survive a confidence
    vote.
  • The Conservatives have also benefitted from floor crossers. When Stephen Harper first
    took office, he poached former Liberal cabinet minister David Emerson (2006) days after
    his re-election as a Liberal, adding a critical seat and important experience to his new
    minority government. Even recently, Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives benefited from
    Liberal MP Leona Alleslev joining the opposition, hurting former Prime Minister Justin
    Trudeau’s governing Liberals.
  • Famously, the the Bloc Québécois gained Lucien Bouchard (1990) from Brian Mulroney’s
    governing Progressive Conservatives, giving the fleging party a toe hold in the House.
  • The Green Party once welcomed Liberal MP Blair Wilson (2007) to their side of the aisle,
    and the NDP has had Liberal MPs defect to their party, albeit post-defection.

Why is it controversial?

Proponents argue floor crossing reflects MPs’ evolving views or better policy fits, allowing voter representation without byelections. Critics call it a betrayal of voters who elected the MP under the original party banner, eroding trust in our democracy in the process. However, since every party in the House has benefited from some type of defection – and most have received floor crossing boosts at some point in recent history – it’s a bit rich to criticize the move when it’s inconvenient and celebrate it when it’s helpful.


What does this mean for the governing Liberal Party?


With Idlout’s switch, the Liberals now hold 170 seats in the 343-seat House of Commons. Remember: three seats are currently vacated (not occupied) due to recently called byelections. With 172 seats needed to form a majority government in the 343-seat House, if the Liberals win two of three byelections (likely), the Carney-led Liberals will be able to upgrade their minority government to a majority.


Why does a majority government matter again?


A minority needs opposition support for bills; a majority passes legislation alone. This distinction, core to Canadian politics, is covered extensively in Nature Labs (see our social studies unit!).


A caveat!


The Speaker, elected from government ranks but impartial in theory, vacates their party seat and doesn’t vote except in ties. In essence, the Liberals need 173 seats total post-byelections to offset this reality, ensuring control of the governing agenda despite the Speaker’s non-voting role in routine proceedings. In other words, the Liberals would love to win all three byelections, including one in Quebec that is being ordered by the courts after the Liberal candidate won by only won (contested) vote in the last election.


Also!


Even with 173 seats in the House, it’d be razor-thin majority government (barely over half), vulnerable to future defections or resignations. (Floor crossings can happen both ways, remember!) However, if the Liberals secure a majority through byelection wins and floor crossings – and don’t lose any more members from their side of the aisle in the coming years – Carney’s Liberals could govern for up to five years before the next election.


Why Carney wants a majority


Prime Minister Mark Carney wants to upgrade his government from minority to majority to create governing stability during challenging times, stating that a majority would help strengthen his mandate during important negotiations, such as the upcoming renewal of CUSMA (the Canada-US-Mexico free trade pact). To better understand the challenges Canada’s faces, don’t forget to check out our Canada at a Crossroads series!

Reflection Questions & Key Terms

Questions

Why do some people believe floor crossing is unfair to voters?

Why might an MP decide to switch parties during their term?

Why is the 172-seat threshold important in the House of Commons?

How does a majority government differ from a minority government?

Why does the Speaker of the House affect the number of seats a party effectively needs for control?

Do you think MPs should have to call a byelection if they switch parties? Why or why not?

Should voters focus more on the individual candidate or the political party when voting? Explain your thinking.

How might floor crossing affect public trust in democracy?

Terms

Floor Crossing

Member of Parliament

Party Allegiance

Minority Government

Majority Government

House of Commons

Caucus

By-Election

Westminster System

Parliamentary Tradition/Convention

Speaker of the House

Mandate (political)

Opposition Parties

Reflection Questions & Activities by Subject

Social Studies/Civics

  1. How does Canada’s Westminster parliamentary system influence political practices like floor crossing?
  2. Should Canada create a law requiring MPs who cross the floor to resign and run again in a byelection? Why or why not?
  3. How could a majority government change the way laws are passed compared to a minority government?
  4. What role do political parties play in representing citizens’ views?
  5. How might floor crossing affect regional representation, especially for places like Nunavut?
  6. What does this issue reveal about the balance between individual representation and party loyalty in democracy?

Science

  1. In science, systems often need balance or stability to function. How is this similar to political stability in government?
  2. Can you compare the shifting alliances in politics to changes in ecosystems (for example, when a species moves into a new role in a food web)?
  3. What might happen in a scientific system if one key component suddenly changes sides or function? How is that similar to floor crossing in politics?
  4. Why is adaptation important in both natural systems and political systems?

English/Language Arts

  1. If you were writing an opinion piece, would you argue for or against floor crossing? What evidence would you use?
  2. Write a short paragraph imagining you are an MP explaining to your voters why you crossed the floor.
  3. How does the article use examples from history to strengthen its argument?

Art/Media

  1. Design a political cartoon illustrating the idea of floor crossing in Parliament. What symbols would you use?
  2. If you were creating an infographic, how would you visually explain the difference between a minority and majority government?
  3. How can visual media influence how people feel about political issues?

Careers/Real-World Connections

  1. What careers are involved in the political system besides being an MP (e.g., journalists, policy analysts, campaign managers)?
  2. What skills do politicians need when making difficult decisions like switching parties?
  3. How might floor crossing affect someone’s public reputation or career in politics?
  4. If you worked as a political advisor, what advice would you give an MP thinking about crossing the floor?
  5. Why is public trust important in careers related to leadership and government?
  6. If you were an MP and felt your party no longer represented your values, would you stay with the party, cross the floor, or resign and run again? Explain your reasoning.

Recent News

A New Leader for the Federal NDP

Avi Lewis won the NDP leadership race to succeed...

A major court case could shape the future of Canada

The Canadian Supreme Court just wrapped up hearings on...

Iran War Briefing

The Iran war, which started February 28th with US-Israeli...

International Women’s Day

Happy International Women's Day! Today is a day to recognize the...

Exciting Announcement: Section1.ca!

Nature Labs is thrilled to announce an exciting partnership...

Tomorrow, We’re Still Canada

Well, we can't touch 'em all, Joe. And today, that...